In a world without clear collaboration, real estate agents who believe in the value of multiple listing services will take more persuasive action, an Intel survey of 3,000 U.S. consumers finds. It turns out.
This report is available exclusively to subscribers of Inman Intel, Inman’s data and research division, providing deep insight and market intelligence into the residential real estate and proptech businesses. Subscribe now.
Real estate professionals are constantly striving to get their clients’ properties in front of more potential buyers, and they continue to primarily support industry regulations that require most properties to be listed on the MLS.
However, many customers support giving sellers more options, especially in the area of home seller privacy.
A survey of 3,000 U.S. working adults conducted last week as part of an Inman-Dig Insights consumer survey found that potential customers are more likely than real estate agents to understand issues related to the National Association of Realtors’ clear cooperation policy. It became clear that there was also uncertainty and that opinions were divided.
These findings shed new light on some of the most vexing issues at the heart of the debate over seller privacy and transaction transparency.
And if Clear Collaboration is revoked, it reveals the uphill battle many real estate agents will face trying to convince some clients of the benefits of listing their properties on the MLS.
Please read the report below for a detailed breakdown.
far perspective
A large sample of consumers, intended to be representative of the U.S. adult workforce, do not appear to have strong opinions about Clearoperative and are divided on this issue.
In a consumer survey conducted by Intel in January, 37% of working adults in the United States said they would “prefer to have the option to defer” listing on the MLS when selling a home. Additionally, 33% said they believe agents “should be required” to list their properties on the MLS. The remaining 30% said they were unsure or needed more information.
Working adults in the United States were also divided on two related questions.
When asked to choose which statement they agreed with more, 53 percent of consumers agreed with the idea that home sellers “don’t have enough options” to protect their privacy from buyers. This idea narrowly won out over the competing notion that homebuyers “don’t have access to enough information” about properties for sale, with 47% of respondents choosing this idea. However, when faced with the specific question of whether home sellers should have the option to hide a home’s “date on the market,” consumers were more likely to do so than sellers (46%) by a small margin. They sided with buyers (54%).
Most consumers don’t seem to know much about Clear Collaboration. And their attitudes seem to depend in part on which specific consequences of the policy attract their attention.
A significant percentage of consumers believe that home seller privacy should be a higher priority than it currently is, which means sellers withhold certain important details from buyers, such as how long a property has been left unattended. Please note that this does not authorize you to do so. Unsold on the market.
However, the above results reflect broader consumer sentiment, including those who have never purchased a home and are especially not close to entering the market.
The consumers that real estate agents deal with on a daily basis have a decidedly different perspective on these questions.
What today’s clients believe
Among active home buyers currently on the market in early January, a group that was more closely involved in the home-buying process, a clearer, more seller-friendly picture emerged.
Seventy-nine percent of active home buyers who had listed a home as part of their home search in early January said they would have preferred to have the option to withhold the property from the MLS, but would rather have had the option to withhold the property from the MLS. Only 16% said they thought they should be required to submit one. 84% of active buyers listing their homes supported the broader concept of a seller’s right to privacy over a buyer’s right to information. 73% of active buyers looking to list a home said home sellers should have the option of keeping their home unsold private, whereas home buyers said that Only 27% said they should be able to know how long a property is unsold. sitting in the market
As expected, first-time buyers and renters who were actively shopping for a home in early January were less likely to side with the seller.
Still, even a sizable portion of this group seemed sensitive to the idea that once a home is purchased, it doesn’t need to be submitted to the MLS when it comes time to sell later.
46% of first-time buyers and renters who are actively considering a home purchase say they believe home sellers should have the option to withhold a property from the MLS, More than 30% of respondents said it was necessary to make property listings compulsory. Fifty-seven percent of first-time buyers and renters favored privacy for home sellers over homebuyer information, but that percentage was much smaller than active shoppers listing their homes. . Additionally, 58% of buyers who have not put their home on the market say home sellers should have the option to hide a property’s “on sale date” from buyers, whereas buyers do not. 42% said that information should be accessible.
Explicit cooperation remains a complex issue that many consumers struggle to understand. When dealing with clients, agents are likely to argue that the MLS is the best place to list to reach the most potential buyers.
And many customers may agree with these arguments. But broadly speaking, real estate customers accepted alternatives that gave sellers more choice.
About Inman-Dig Insights Consumer Research
The Inman-Dig Insights consumer survey was conducted from January 7th to January 8th to assess Americans’ opinions and behaviors regarding homebuying.
The study sampled a diverse group of 3,000 full-time or part-time employed American adults between the ages of 24 and 65. Participants were selected to create a broadly representative breakdown by age, gender, and region.
Statistical rigor was maintained throughout the study, and the results should be largely representative of attitudes held by U.S. adults with full-time or part-time jobs. Both Inman and Dig Insights are majority-owned by Toronto-based Bellinger Capital.
Email Daniel Huston
