Many years ago, my dad provided me with water reduction. (Many such examples, but I have a particular case in mind.) When in class, when he tells me, I will never be afraid to raise your hand and ask a question. People often reluctant to do this, he said. Because they fear that they will appear slower than their classmates. When the teacher pauses and asks, “Do you have any questions?” And then no one else around you has, it’s easy to feel like everyone else is speeding up, and you’re sticking out to keep up. But there can be a lot of people asking a lot of questions when everyone else in your class feels that way. Furthermore, it was particularly profitable. He said, “Have you ever been in class and confused by the subject? Of course the answer was yes. And that was an extra reason for Astion. Doing so would give me the opportunity to be that guy – by asking the question I might also help other people who need clarification, but who were too nervous to get the help they need.
At that last point, my father spoke like an economist, albeit without technical terms. In economic jargon, asking questions had the opportunity to create positive externalities. I may gain more understanding for myself, but others can benefit as well. For this reason, individuals may underestimate asking questions, and there are too few questions in the class. Pointing this out was the way I tried to internalize externalities – if I feel confused by the total points, then to consider this, it is possible that at least a few others are as well, which should motivate me to ask questions.
Another point is tied to previous posts about favouring preferences. Reluctant to ask questions in a classroom setting for fear that you may not seem to keep up with the event is another case where people may be false about their preferences. Publicly, students express that they are speeding up and don’t need any additional information, but personally they want extra explanations. If an individual is the only person who is confused and worried about looking stupid compared to everyone else, we can come to a scenario in which the Eyene personally wants a special explanation, but publicly expresses his desire to move forward with Mooming.
Icoclast is a sumone that boldly and loudly robs the distant attitude of traditional (expressed) public opinion. Iconoclasts can attract a lot of criticism. On the other hand, in situations where there is tampering with WidesPretad preferences, the only way out of it is at least the sub-person willing to publicly inform their private beliefs. This makes it a little easier for the next person to do that. Those who do so at first may face intense criticism for even attempting to cancel, but the Iconocrat enjoys the controversy rather than being determined by it.
This has its overtones and drawbacks. In the worst case, we have a troll – people who simply say outrageous things for the purpose of cash rage, and enjoy doing so. On the other hand, at least in the amount, people who are truly icoclastic can begin the process of breaking their preferred counterfeit spells. Trolls don’t have twice as many as Iconoclasts. However, bypassing this, the value of open and free expressions does not decrease. Most new ideas are awful, but SOM is a real breakthrough. There is no way to identify it in advance. This will be that – because in doing so you need to know in advance what your future experience will show. As Yogi Bella once said, predictions are difficult, especially about the future.
It can be done in parallel with the work done by venture capitalists. They know that most ventures in support turn out to be luof and fail – but here only a few people have great success. There is no way to know it in advance – if they know it, they only invest their money in those rare few and trouble the rest. But they don’t know which is which – and can’t, so they can invest widely in Vray and find some good ideas of them and stick out.
The same can be said in the market for ideas. Of all the ideas that have made social consensus much out, most people are simply dubs, and the people who defend them will likely be trolls who want to stand up from the people. But the total few differ – and it is possible to express hidden beliefs more freely, although generally hell. I don’t know which idea will be which one.
