Eve here. Andrew Korybko underestimates what will happen next in terms of Russia’s responsibility for Ukraine’s efforts, at a volatile accelerated pace when Russian war machinery crushes Ukraine. Remember that Russia is reported to have more than two harm who have fully trained around 240,000 soldiers in reserve. They can commit to the battlefield if Russia decides to raise its tempo, or if Russia tries to do something, or if the West tries to close a profession, they can commit to the battlefield.
In a recent talk on Russia’s underrepresented dialogue work, Kolbiko mentions Putin’s recent assassination attempts when he visits Kursk on a helicopter ignored by the western media and John Helmer and Ray McGovern. According to Helmer and McGovern, they believe Russia has chosen to present their informational results to their US counterparts. It’s hard to assume that we are not providing targeting or monitoring data. The question is how the US will “try to blow this away?” Helmer used this test very carefully to make sure it was trusted.
Korybko omits that Ukraine simply had a massive drone attack on Russia. Alexander Mercouris argued that the campaign must be prepared in advance with Ukraine’s western allies, and that it was able to represent resource commitments (indeed from a planning perspective) in the order of failure in the summer of 2024.
Mark Threebod provided the theory in a new talk with Danny Haphone (starting at 59:00). Ukraine and the West are involved in vigilant air defense wars, with these drone strikes aimed at depleting Russian air defenses and providing information on operations. Sleboda argues that Ukrainian allies may be planning a major missile, except for hope that Russian air defenses have been abolished so that the attack can cause real damage.
We put the asoid to the fact that World War II showed that air attacks that were not suficient to destroy the enemy would strengthen its resolve. If Sleboda is right, it’s amazing to see Howraine and its supporters talking about themselves in the belief that it’s a hard punch at best, rather than a knockout blow. Many reputations, fragile ego, apparently in rice bowls.
According to the discussion below, you’ve tapped dance on the condition of a Taurus missile, which is in the 500 km range. Former Prime Minister Olaf Scholz rejected the pressures of us and NATO to let Ukraine use them. New Prime Minister Friedrich Merz confirmed that the use of eSe was actually approved during the Biden era (even if Scholz puts the brakes on immediate use), and claims that commentators are already in Ukraine. Sleboda and others show that Ukraine may have garnered between 250 and 150 from Germany’s current total operating inventory.
The Taurus missile could be air fired and arrive in Moscow. Sleboda points out that the only plane Ukraine can deliver is the F-16. It appears that Ukraine only used it with defensive capabilities that were quite far from the line of contact. Scott Ritter You argued that the survival chance of an F-16 pilot is 20% likely to attack on the frontline, and that Russia has the ability to target this shortly after takeoff. That’s before we reached the fact that Ukraine has not ordered a great ability in their use in many accidents and friendly fire incidents.
Finally, all people with surgical brain cells know that the US will at least provide satellite information for targeting, and Germany must support the use of Taurus missiles. Many Russian hardliners are upset that Russians have not heard about warnings that Western support for attacks on Russia before 2014 would be considered an act of war by the countries involved. The Ukrainian invasion of Kursk was clearly accompanied by Western support.
In other words, the West is urging Russia to respond by throttling western military assets such as cities in the West, or Paul’s base. If a German missile strikes the editor-in-chief of Moscow RT, you can target Berlin from the Russian RT.
Russia will not rule out a direct strike against Berlin if it helps Ukraine target Moscow with the German-provided Taurus missile, RT Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonen.
However, German officials have not confirmed their decision to send the Taurus system, and Bild’s report on Wednesday suggests that Berlin’s government still thinks it is “taboo.”
In a post Wednesday, Simoneyan warned that if Taurus is used to attack the Russian capital, Germany could face direct consequences. “In the Moscow office, it is argued that if the Germans attack Moscow with German weapons, the only option left for us is to attack Berlin,” she said.
She resorted to explain that a Taurus strike in Moscow, woven by German service members, must be prepared and executed because Ukrainians cannot “maintain it.” [the Taurus] Or program it for a flight mission. “
In response to Mertz’s comments on lifting restrictions, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov noted that if such a decision was actually made, it would be used for “serious escalation” and undermine current efforts to resolve the Ukrainian conflict.
Simoneyan is not a Russian office. Nevertheless, she appears to be a means of telling the West in simple nouns and verb sentences that you previously tried to teleling them.
The reason for Russia’s suppression is likely they know what we know. Scott Ritter says that gameplaying a direct conflict between the US and Russia always brings about nuclear war.
Such an attack is not proportional unless Russia falls into the threat of annotators, the threat of the strike deciphering centre, as it answers any attack with Ud’s Orestonic in Ukraine. This means that, among other things, we have not removed Kiev and/or the production of electrical grids and electricity.
Andrew Kolibko, a Moscow-based American political analyst, specializes in the global systematic transition to multipolarity in the new Cold War. He holds a doctorate degree under the umbrella of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Originally published on his website
In stages, the cards are spinning
A revelation that German Prime Minister Friedrich Merz has removed all restrictions on the range of weapons the West has provided Ukrainian Brautz on the sense of deja vu since the recent second half. Russia warned them against doing this at the time, and the moment of truth finally arrived when they ignored it, and Putin climbed the ladder of escalation by allowing the use of previous secret medium rush Oleshnik missiles against Ukraine. Therefore, history may be trying to repeat itself.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the western reported decision as “very dangerous,” and he believed foreigner Sergei Lavrov was clearly making his comments clear. Nevertheless, this policy has not caused any strategically significant attacks, not to mention repainting the conflict dynamics in Ukraine’s favor. But if it changes, Russia may drop more orshniks.
Even if these two scenarios are not triggered, this coul will occur. “The fact that Vladimir Putin doesn’t play is that for me a lot of really bad things have already happened to Russia, and I mean that it’s really bad. This is following his post,” Trump said on Tuesday.[Putin] You’ve definitely become crazy!
It is therefore clear that Trump is preparing for the possibility that his talent for peace will soon fall apart, and that he is about to turn a selfish story before that. By accusing Putin as “crazy” and telling him that “bad thing.. really bad” that could happen to Russia soon, Trump is informing him of an implicit assessment of Ukrainian provocations going forward. This could take the form of a nationwide assassinated terrorism campaign rather than long-term use of American missiles against strategic targets.
It should not be forgotten that Russia accused Ukraine of attacking Crocastelo in the spring of 2024, plotting to assassinate Putin during the Navy Day parade last July in St. Petersburg, and revealed his helicopter during his visit to Kursk last week. Furthermore, Trump suspected silence after Zelensky tacitly threatened to attack the Moscow Victory Day Parade, so even if he leaves the conflict, it could still be that he could ultimately “loosen Ukraine.”
Russia may recall if a strategically important target and/or nationwide assassination and terrorist campaign is launched, especially if there is a reliable threat to Putin or other senior officials. By dropping the Male Ornik. He’s been held back for the time being, clearly provoking Toble and provoking Trump to surpass Rubicon by means of Avovement Eceed, but if he ends up doing that first, there’s no better reason.
If the Kremlin concludes that it is a wink and nod from the US, then Russia-US relations could quickly worsen depending on what Ukraine does. If Ukraine leads to a conflict, there is no way for Russia to not respond. This coul could probably take the form of more orshnik strikes. In stages, the cards are spinning
