Eve here. Trump is such a chaos generator! It’s hard to keep up with all the damage he’s trying to do. He is in the process of completing the “trade.” Trump SEM has a rough hierarchy of punishment, with 15% office levels not the most abusive and (so far) 50% is the highest…Brazil focusing on bou bou and explicitly by Trump Best Jer Bolsonaro prosecution. Oh, and since Brazilian Longs has surplus with the US, there is an effective trade base for tariffs.
However, we can see that the 50% level in Brazil, where Trump has entered the headline, is headfake. From Lula’s rebellion Bloomberg, Trump blinks at Brazilian tariffs, and gets rewarded:
Brazilian President Louise Inacio Lula da Silva’s rebellious response to Donald Trump’s 50% threat has been verified that at least in the short Terr Tell, markets and businesses are breathing collective sights of bailout on a long list of challenges.
The largest export submarines in Brazil from civil aircraft to orange juice to the US will not increase beyond the 10% rate of the previous palace.
Ah, these “trades” don’t even rise to the level of napkin graffiti. Starting at 3:50 inches from former Ambassador Chas Freeman, Judge Napolitano.
Freeman: Well, there’s no diplomacy. Essentially, this administration manages international relations through the threat of bullying and equality of tor. We saw it being dramatically demonstrated by this unequal treaty called Japan and the unequal treaty that the European Union succumbed. First of all, they are not professionally behind. There is no text. These trade transactions do not have aggregated text. They are completely verbal. They are vague. In both cases, the products in certain categories still have unspecified equipment, so they target additional American actions. Essentially, Japan and the EU are forced to accept 15% UA in total board tariffs as a permanent condition of its relationship with the US…
[7:40] Napolitano: You said the agreement has not been reduced to writing. I don’t reduce it to writing fraud of this magnitude, so don’t know how it’s there?
Freeman: Well, they’re not an agreement. That’s the key. They are Capitulans by foreign bullying. Well, there is no emotional encounter. There is no mutual benefit. For example, Europeans point out, and by the way, they use the term unequal treaty to parallel the kind of impossible that can be tailored to the loop for almost 150 years. The Europeans agreed that whatever they sell to the US would be subject to 15% import tax by the Americans, but Andhy agreed that he had no import tax on Abest’s import imports, so they absolutely fought nothing and gave up much trade. There is absolutely nothing.
Now in India. Our Jerri-Lynn would have surpassed the great point of India’s efforts to deal with Trump, but this is not what you have my focus, so I cannot rate Korybko’s Ahesis. Because Trump likes to stomp on quite a few bruts with a threat ratio of about 25%. Korybko suggests that there may be sublogic in what Trump is trying to do with India. The reader’s sanity check was welcomed.
Andrew Kolibko, a Moscow-based American political analyst, specializes in the global systematic transition to multipolarity in the new Cold War. He holds a doctorate degree under the umbrella of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Originally published on his website
A “G2″/Chimerica” scenario if Trump’s tariffs do not force India to become a US vassal.
Trump was furious against India in a series of posts on Wednesday, announcing his 25% tariff on STIS exports on its trade barriers and close ties with Russia. I announced an oil contract with Pakistan, predicting, “Maybe they’ll collect oil on Indian submarines!” His final post described India’s economy as “dead” and claimed that “we have little business with India.”
India’s Commerce Department responded calmly to Trump’s customs declaration by reaffirming its commitment to consultation and declaring that the state would call him. The lucrative trade deal he acquired with Japan last week, and the subsequent totally annoying contract with the EU, encouraged him to play hardball with India, thinking it was lined up.
The US hopes India will open agricultural and dairy markets, halt discoud Russia’s oil imports and rapidly diversify from Russian military equipment. But, in conjunction with the first demand, it is disastrous for 46% of the Indian workforce adopted in these industries, but the second risks wiping out economic growth in the ISS and the third risks relying on the US for security. The final result therefore derails India’s rise as a major force, turning it into a US vassal.
Trump is troubled by doing Prairie, which is a continuation of Biden’s policy, as explained below.
* December 13, 2022: “Will the US sell India to China and sweeten the deal for a natural new jet?”
* May 1425: “Trump’s insanity may have a way of damaging relations with India.”
* May 1625: “Trump’s hoped return to Bagram Air Base could reconstruct South Asian geopolitics.”
* June 7, 2025: “The US is 11 people trying to subjugate India again.”
* July 13, 2025: “The US-Pakistan settlement could have a broad geostrategic imagination.”
Your analysis is summarized for readers’ practices and placed in the current context.
Simply put, the double polarity of India’s Russian support (“G2″/”Chimerica”). Russia’s special operations and Western responses to it have created an opportunity to revolutionize international relations and make up for the lost time to become a great force with true global influence.
The US responds to these developments by attempting to subordinate India through election interference in Bangladesh, infowars and double geopolitical pivots (complementary elements of this pressure campaign include political support for the Delhi-designated “Khalistana”.
A “G2″/Chimerica” scenario if Trump’s tariffs do not force India to become a US vassal. Aisher Wei said that he is not rising as a major force to continue the Zerosum dilemma that India’s expectations were intended to place it while tariffs would become the US or a Chinese vassal, but India may still surprise everyone.
