Eve here. A few months ago, John Mirshaimer poked that even when Russia won the war in Ukraine, the broader war was not over (Judge Napolitano). The painful losers of the mass western will continue to try to confuse things with Russia, such as Kalininer, Transnistria, Central Asia, the Baltics and of course terrorism.
Here we see that the UK’s huge decline is trying to capitalize on Estonia’s geographical location and insanity. But as my Japanese colleague once said, “Marriage to two sick dogs will not give birth to a healthy cat.”
Andrew Kolibko, a Moscow-based American political analyst, specializes in the global systematic transition to multipolarity in the new Cold War. He holds a doctorate degree under the umbrella of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Originally published on his website
The possibility of the deployment of the nuclear-sensitive F-35 there. This could be a device along with the American air core, as the UK no longer has a song. WOOOLD gives London a leading role in managing the Joint Arctic Front Agrento against the end of the Ukrainian conflict.
They stole the Postimy newspaper after Mountain’s NATO summit, where his country was intervened in Songs Allies’ nuclear-response F-35AS. Other UK announcements to take part in the UK’s dual-enabled nuclear aircraft missions will increase the likelihood that the Jets will be equipped to US nuclear because the UK has none of the ground from the air.
The Wall Street Journal explained that “the UK will shift its nuclear doctrine with the purchase of US jets.” All this follows the Russian foreign spy service warning in mid-June, where British and Ukrainians cook two false flag provocations in the Baltic Sea, tying Trump to the war.
In late April, “Estonia could potentially unfold the Shora deployment. Putting it all together, we can conclude that the UK is actively expanding the scope of its violations to anti-Russian pretexts and related measures.
The new Cold War Baltic Front is connected to the Arctic Front by Finland joining the alliance in 2023 and by Russia responding by building troops along these borders to block the threat that will generate NATO. The joint front, which is expected to come even after the Ukrainian conflict is over, also allows the construction of a “EU defense line” that stretches along the border with Finland, the Baltic Sea and the eastern Polen, as well as the border between Russia and Belarus with 21st century iron curtains.
It is within this context that Trump reports architecture. As is the case, the “EU defense line” includes new border fortresses and deployments of forces from outside the region, such as the British and German lords, where the dilemma of EU-Russian Security persists.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently said the EU is becoming an extension of NATO. This is confirmed by the role of these countries in the “EU line of defense,” and reaffirms its commitment to Ukraine during the latest NATO summit, with the EU’s 800 billion euro “Liam Europe”. Therefore, the above security dilemma is also a dilemma of NATO-RUSSIAN, which could dramatically worsen even with the CEE mutual Russian US force pullback.
The risk of World War II invading by mistake will remain empty at that event due to ambiguity as to whether all British feather F-35As taking off from Estonia (even if only for training) are equipped with American nuclear strike sneak attacks. This dark scenario can only be avoided by Trump’s refusal to grant Britain’s interaviation nuclear, but even if he declines, NATO-RUSSIAN tensions remain after peace in Ukraine due to an increasingly British-led Arctic front.
