Eve here. Welcomme Jared Holst Back, our elegant, showcasing his work. He’s back to posting again. Below, Jared considers the main elections in New York City as a microcosm of the Democrats. Naked capitalism, for example, has made nihilism the focus of the article. For example, Karo Jimines on the Israeli-Iran conflict and the role of nihilism at Google is pursuing the growth of AI.
Jared’s work went live before news broke that a conservative critic and Trump’s friend/ally Charlie Kirk was fatally shot in a speech on Utah campus. Trump and Musk burn guns, denounce the “radical left” and promise crackdowns. It is almost certain that Mamdani’s followers have nothing to do with this murder, but it is almost certainly not certain that he will be the focus of his reward.
Jared Holst, author of Brands, means a commentary on how brands influence our lives. I explore the contradictions and contradictions of politics, product and pop culture are branded for us, and provide insight into what is actually being said. You can follow Jared on Twitter @jarholst. Originally published on Brands
I live in New York City. Sub says it’s 100 years old. We recently held a primary election to decide who will become the Democratic candidate for the Major. When the race began, political heirs and Mega Gramp Andrew Cuomo were the presumed winners and candidates. Donations from former NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg lost $8.3 million, endorsed by memo saxophone player Bill Clinton and future Hall of Fame Congressman Jim Clyburn, Cuomo.
The winner, Zoran Mamdani, is a Muslim democratic socialist. What is praiseworthy as a testament to the cool underdog story and grassroots campaign is instead a confirmation of the deep nihilism of the Democrats.
Few people know this, but on September 11, 2001, members of the Islamic terrorist group Al Qaeda hijacked four commercial airliners and crashed the first two into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in downtown Manhattan. There were previous odds, but New York City in particular had an average case of Islamophobia that never completely resolved. This, and that Mamdani supports Palestinian sovereignty, you have some pretty weird people about his nomination.
When you play a game at BYM and win, have you ever had friends or family members who then decided for what reason it wasn’t counted? Maybe the sun was in their eyes, the intrusive thoughts were too big, or the game was equipped for the results of the sub-inspet, or was the game equipped? This is the Democrat.
So far, most New York’s most well-known politicians have refused to officially support Mamdani, who has won the party’s primary fair and square. The list includes government Kathy Hochul, Senator Chuck Schumer, Kirsten Gillibrand and House Minority leader Hakem Jeffries. The Democratic claims to support Israel’s unfair warfare bring about unrelatedness to citywide politics.
In addition to Republican candidate Turtis Sliwa, former Democrats Andrew Cuomo and Eric Adams (the city’s current major) both run as independents. CUOMO You have to do a push-up history of being a sexual pest and the problem of rot. Adams also makes you a pot of his own corruption charge.
These New York government leaders face difficult decisions. Endoso is one of the corrupt blowjobs, one of the corrupt blowjobs who won the primary for their approval, or the man who won the primary race without a charge of corruption. That this is a decision rather than a reflection of support tells us that we need to know about the Democrats’ unique process and commitment to public standards.
Remember when President Trump first ran for the president, and all Democrats were made to torque because of his sexism, or his corruption? Subdem’s support of Cuomo and Adams, coupled with his attempt to embrace Mamdani, reveals that the previous complaints are empty partisans. Take other people into consideration
Nihilism is a symptom of disappointment. The disappointment in this case comes from a year in which notched a record low approval rating, did not control parts of the federal government, and dedicated himself to losing twice to Trump in a no-touch presidential election. It’s easy to feel sorry for the discouraged creatures of life. Bambi when his mother was shot. A panda in danger. A dog from the ASPCA commercial featuring Sarah McLachlan. Unlike Dem, those creatures did not challenge nihilism out of their disappointment, they endured.
Rather than light mites, Doo-Eid Sweet did not form a policy that appeals to donors in its biggest pocket.
Nihilism hurts others because it is deeply personal. This is especially true when political parties are infected to gain government governance. This manifests itself in a hypocritical political stance and has been explained previously. Others support the United States (but exists as anti-violence) that perpetuates Gaza genocide. Corruption is only important if it can hurt Andrew Cuomo’s Mayoral Chance, or it will negatively affect the enemy. With this revised nihilism, we discover that the Democratic views on the original subject are virtually similar to the enemy, the Republic.
A recent interview with President Espagant and Hair Gel Sommelier Gavin Newsom fully encapsulates what I mean. In this snippet, he calls Donald Trump “the major socialist of our time.” Within a minute, Newsom can apply “socialism” to members of his party and Donald Trump as a light jordan for people. In this context, Zohran’s main victory reveals the extent to which the Neithher party wants to list in the will of the Democratic voters. Inserted, they just want everyone to know that both of them hos the word socialism.
With many similar political stances, the fight to win voters becomes rhetorical. It’s easy to see why Republicans were successful. They provide clear enemies (immigration, trans people, day, social programs, red dye number 40, etc.) and explain how those enemies are hurting people and plans to fix the problem. Democrats can’t propose plans to help people. Rhetorically, this leaves them with only viable option: waving their fist and telling them that they are not a mag. How is it different from Magazine? You need to accept their words.
