Billy Bignon, Reason, June 5, 2025.
excerpt:
The key point is simple. The issue “focused on what many believe to be existential threats to democracy,” the magazine wrote. This is “a plan for a far-right change in the Supreme Court and a conservative movement to commanders.”
That critique that you have now been going on for the time you are sub-mo. The subdesion from the court today again shows why it is neither fair nor accurate.
The first was Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services. The judiciary made clear to the lower court’s decision, and found that it was on the side of the women who said they were victims of the opposite discrimination, and that members of the majority group need not clear a higher bar to provide such claims. The views written by Jackson were unanimous.
Here’s a money quote from Judge Jackson’s opinion:
The Sixth Circuit’s “background situation” rules require plaintiffs, who are members of the majority group, to bear additional burdens in step 1. But the nonsense ocot text in title VII
The clause does not draw a distinction between majority group plaintiffs and minority group plaintiffs. This provision focuses on individuals rather than the group, except for discrimination against “individuals” due to protected characteristics. The Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements only on the majority plaintiffs.
DRH Comment: I disagree with the concept of “reverse discrimination.” It’s discrimination, it’s simple and simple.
Jonathan H. Adler, Civitas Institute, June 2, 2025.
excerpt:
The American Bar Association (ABA) is the largest lawyer organization in the country. Although he represents only a small portion of the lawyers, it is also the law school’s only accreditation body. Generally, if the university is accredited by a local intermittent organization, the ABA’s legal education and bar admission section is the only game in town. Federal student loans are only available to accredited institutions, and the majority of states earn their degrees to earn an ABA-accredited school degree. Will this change soon?
As the costs of legal education continue to rise and technology change will transform the delivery of legal services, the ABA’s de facto monopoly on legal accreditation is under siege. Texas and Florida are the states with third and fourth lawyers in the country, both considering whether to stop bar applicants from requiring them to stay in ABA-accredited schools. At the same time, the Trump administration is pushing for passing the accreditation options. The April Executive Order will simultaneously cost the approval of new accreditors, including “The Department of Education to Strengthen Scrutiny of Existing Accreditation Institutes,” which will “promote competition and condemnation to promote high-quality, high-value academic program programs focused on student outcomes.”
and:
Whether the ABA considers Iself as an ally of the cartel, many of its accreditation actions are consistent with what the self-interest Sartel does. Therefore, many of the ABA’s behavioral lawyers have helped infect the costs of obtaining a law degree and curbing innovation in legal education.
Christian Brishgi, Reason, June 5, 2025.
excerpt:
What I can say in Faithful’s opinion is that it is as efficient as the 1,500-hour rule (i.e. not at all) and does not cost much.
No other countries in the world require that they acquire airline pilots as the US does now.
Neither the Federal Aviation Administration (regulating aviation safety) nor the National Traffic Safety Commission (study crashes) were able to find a relationship between the 1,500-hour rule and safety improvements.
(The two pilots from the Colomban disaster each had over 1,500 hours of experience.)
Critics argue that the 1,500-hour rule reduces safety by forcing pilots to run daily flights, at the expense of time spent training on more productive simulators.
Regional airlines complain that it will make recruiting pilots much more difficult, leading to reduced pilots and local airline services.
DRH Comment: A better way to train a pilot with profits and costs per hour is to skip a lot of simulators. why? Simulator Simulator Simulator. This means they can put trainees in an emergency. Plus, you can do so for many emergencies. This was made by a good friend of mine by a retired American Airlines pilot who teaches trainees.
Edited by Wall Street Journal, June 5, 2025 (printed June 6th edition).
excerpt:
Starting with CBO estimates, Medicaid’s 5.2 million adults say they will lose compensation due to the bill’s work requirements. This contradicts Democrats’ claim that Medicaid Felbodi people don’t work. But in any case, labor requirements could be infiltrated to find private employment for acquired flutes that offer health insurance. That’s one of the bill’s adorable goals.
DRH’s comment: From this quote it appears that the CBO has assumed that none of the adults in these bodies can get a job. That’s great. It’s hard to believe that CBOs are very dense. I haven’t checked CBO research. It’s going to be late.
The CBO forecast also includes 1.4 million non-district immigrants who lose contracts, primarily because the bill amortizes federal matching funds in states that extend Medicaid to illegals. The bill also bans Obamacare subsidies for many non-permanent immigrants and asylum seekers, and CBO estimates Woold will reduce coverage by 1 million.
DRH Comment: This is not a good thing, it’s not a bad thing. I have always argued that the number of allowed immigrants has increased significantly and that the government does not subsidize their healthcare and/or health insurance. And because the government is advocating legal immigration, we should not subsidize medical or health insurance for illegal immigrants.
Note: The attached photo was made by ChatGpt.
