Thomas Neuberger. Originally published on God’s Spies
Responsible Centcom Area (Source: Wikimedia)
“Kurira is especially close to Israel, even by the standards of other American officials.”
– Huffington Post
Who will be in charge?
Who is really in charge of all these wars, the US or Israel? Which client state is it, which is the master? Questions arise, but not because they are being asked, but rather a scholarship is assumed and no one can agare.
Many claim that the tail (Israel or Netanyahu) is waving the dog. Jeffrey Sachs is one of many who have this opinion. Others like Michael Hudson believe we are bosses, and Israel is the “carrier of landed aircraft” in the Near East.
The country, our country and Israel, have been intertwined since the country was founded in Palestine. Joe Biden is not alone in the Hall of Fame when he said this:
How do you look at this question – who is really in charge? – By looking at the context of length: Why are we fighting these wars? Yes, empire (a word that the powerful people began to use). But that’s vague. What does this empire want and what does it mean to get it?
These uncertainties ultimately bring us back to the beginning of American gaming games. This started when they joined the rest of the West in pursuit of colonies and world domination, a game that began before Columbus left sailing. (For more information about this, see Alfred McCoy’s Unfinished Series to the Government. Enter is here. The rest is here.)
But Thos is a background idea of how to drop here. I’ll cover them soon. How are you affected today? Does Israel pawn in the American control game? Or is it that Israel has acquired the center of DC power, so we are ignoring ourselves to meet that need?
I’ll take this in three separate chunks. This is the first. It doesn’t answer our questions alone, but it features the central player, General Michael “Eric” Kurira, and the current commander of the Pentagon, the commander of the current Centcom. Centcom and General Kurilla are, as you can see, Linchpin players.
The second piece details the grand strategies that have evolved today, and shows why there is a focus for all this attention. The third sees Iran from within the country, the problems it faces, the challenges it needs to overcome.
So let’s start with General Curilla.
Kurira focuses on Israel and Iran
General Michael Kurilla, commander of Centcom, has widely considered its integrality in Israel’s plans to attack Iran.
For those who don’t know, Saagar Enjeti (above) is well connected by a right-wing circle, passing through Tucker Carlson’s right-wing media channels. He is strongly opposed to war.
A little more distance from the Huffington Post, which is still running:
The US general of Israel is quietly affecting Trump in Iran
General Eric Kurira said, “He had better information about what [Israel was] More than anyone else in our government…” The former US official told HuffPost.
…While the choice to take part in the war with Iran still depends on Trump, the accumulation of military force suggests an increase in influence of members of the national security team, who most support Israeli-American business operations against Iran.
People in Kurilla’s family told HuffPost that even the standards of other American officials who have worked with longtime US partners are particularly close to Israel. Its proximity has primarily gone to Israeli forces and Intelligence News officials who have long treated Iran as a threat to neighbouring neighborhoods that have not been dealing with for a long time.
“Before we received it more than anyone else in the government, we had better information about what they were doing and what they saw in their intelligence,” said a former US official who spoke openly even when anonymous towing.
Things to note from this article:
“Based on my experience [Kurilla] …It’s hard to see “clashing with political appointments at the Pentagon that attempted to redirect military attention to Asia.” I have the “Panmaring of the Israeli enemy” as a “model of US military choice.”
This leads to one of two conclusions. Probably both. First: Kurira is plain and simple for the Israeli hawk through the Zionists.
But secondly, what is more interesting for our purposes must concern his views on the Middle East. Trump administration submarines see China as the next big challenge – as Obama did, they’re not stuck in the military at all in the Middle East. Too much effort, too far. We are too thin and stretched.
However, there is arguing that Iran is, without intention or existent, a pivotal country for America’s great games. You must first go to this Iran (and Pakistan) to reach Russia and China. So now we’re dealing with Iran and discussing it. Don jumps his gun. The discussion will be shown in the next article.
Do you have this heart’s kurira too? Perhaps not, but that’s possible. Huff Post says, “Commanders like Kurilla have expertise in battlefield victory, but not a long-term strategy.”
Still, whatever reason I support the Israeli attack, I might be strategically correct from a hegemonic standpoint. To carry out the long-standing “pivot to Asia” and if that’s what you want, Iran is really the first domino to line up and skipping it is a mistake.
Details of the next work.
