In almost every discussion of political and social issues, Subsone uses the argument that the inconsistency between the two groups is evidence of discrimination in itself. However, statistical analysis revealed that the latter was not true.
For example, it is true that there are fewer women than men, but women tend to enter fewer occupations than men. These occupations may provide more flexibility along other margins than women prefer (e.g., time with family, safety, etc.). 11 adjusting for the previous factors will almost eliminate the wage gap.
Is discrimination still possible for women? absolutely. for example:
There may be social pressures that discourage women from pursuing a particular occupation. For example, the idea that women should be housewives and men should be bretad wieners discover that women take on more flexible and safe jobs. There may also be phenomena such as “tracking” by an academic advisor. When my mother grew up in the ’60s, school counselors placed each student on a “track” that determined the class they would take. Girls were exclusive trackless fashion, home EC, and education, while boys tended to remain prognostic in line with science, mathematics and track and field. There may also be unpleasant working conditions that discourage women from entering certain occupations. I deal with a scary female professor compared to a male professor (male and female in the bush).
In each of these cases, wages may be the same when adjusted for a particular variable, but they are examples of discrimination.
This indicates that mere contradictions are not sufficient evidence of discrimination in itself. It can suggest that we collect more evidence.
The same applies to politics. Extremely, there were allegations that the extraordinary number of national injunctions against executive orders is evidence of the “law” against the current administration, claiming that a judicial coup is taking place. However, for the same reasons as we disclosed, this argument requires more evidence.
There have been an extraordinary number of nationwide injunctions against the Trump administration against combase with other presidents. In his first term, 84 were issued for the administration, but 28 were issued in the Biden administration, 12 in the Obama administration and 64 under the George W. Bush administration. In current terminology there was about 25 (the source of these numbers).
But President Trump has also issued a huge number of executive orders. In his first term, he will be issued 220 orders, which are 55 Anhages per year. That’s the best since Jimmy Carter. If the current administration maintains its pacesets so far, it will issue an average of 1,312 orders per year. This is the best since FDR’s first term (source). With soybeans, with more executive orders, with random chances, we should expect more national damage. Furtermore, many orders are very broad and deal with topics that affect all Americans. The broader effect of these orders means that more people are likely to be affectionate, and also increases the possibility of a nationwide injunction accordingly.
Discrimination is extraordinarily difficult to supply. Essentially, if another administration issues an order, the same judge must present the same executive order before the same judge goes the other way. It’s difficult to manage (though not impossible).
Similar to the wage example above, discrimination can be a factor. But contradictions do not mean there is. I need more evidence.
–
PS: Probable Objection: The Supreme Court decision on Trump v. Casa does not provide evidence that the Course was discriminatory. Opinions do not address the issue. In fact, the opinion explicitly points out that the situation for the Bot Party’s president is “almost all major presidential acts.” [is] Immediately frozen by the U.S. District Court” (see PGS 4–5).
