I have been closely followed the war in Ukraine since 2022 and now the war SEM is heading towards conclusions, so I was like offering.
The war was planned and led by the Western government
Recent revelations have ended the presence of Ukraine independence in Russia with only financial and logistical support from the US and NATO. In February and March this year, the New York Times published two articles that were widely argued by critics of the US involvement in the Ukrainian War. The United States played a broad role in laying the foundation for military action against Russia. The resultant war. The NYT reported that the US had established CIA bases in Ukrainian thread for Russian invasions, and that the war was being directed towards massive expansion by German US military personnel.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/world/europe/cia-ukraine-intelligence-russia-war.html?searchResultposition = 1
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/03/29/world/europe/us-ukraine-milatiry-war-war-wiesbaden.html
These revelations provided clear evidence that the US and NATO countries were fighting a proxy war with Russia, simply lending material aid to Ukraine. Secretary of State Rubio created the official in an interview statement on March 5, 2025.
Rubio observes loans and acknowledges our proxy war in Ukraine
Western mass media is reliable
The widespread independent internet media coverage emergency of the war has undermined the credibility of legacy mass media. A huge amount of video and map data from the Ukrainian battlefield allows you to observe shift positions and fronts daily. The mist of war was lifted to a considerable extent by the indirect confirmation of the military protons by the Earth-planting strategy against those poses. Therefore, a belliger can undo their propaganda when distributing videos of attacks on enemy forces.
Generally, the co-vegetation of the Ukrainian War from independent Internet Souls has moved on to trends reported in mass media a few weeks ahead. A good example of such close coverage is the military summary channel. Although the channel owner, DiMa, over-editing his commentary, twice-daily reports of battlefield movements are based on multiple sources of information weighted by reliability and are usually correct. There is no equal coverage from legacy media. Inserted Western mass media continues to spin stories in favor of Ukraine based on expanding events while plaguing negative battlefield development or making intense reports.
Typical Military Summary Channel Battlefield Daily Status Map
For example, on June 3, 2025, the New York Times published a homepage article explaining the success of a drone attack on Russian airbags, demonstrating its ability to strategically innovate and strategically innovate Russia’s important benefits. There was no mention of the steady collapse of Ukrainian defenses in Donbas or Smie. Therefore, the “record paper” produced an illusion of Ukraine itself, providing objective information indicating a situation in which objective information from the battlefield was severely worsening.
Unfortunately, public opinion remains strongly influenced by the US military and midnum medium outlets, which effectively serve as a component of total industrial complexity. Most of these founding publishers and broadcasters have supported all the disastrous American wars since 9/11. Their credibility is weakened, but the grip of leading media companies on public opinion remains strong enough for catastrophic military adventures.
Ukraine will lose war
The fundamental concordance of Ukraine and Russia’s military potential was clear at the beginning of the war, but this was rejected by US policymakers because of the armor of ideology. Supported and restrained by birth, Ukraine was assumed to beat the incompetent and illegal Russian forces.
Aside from numerical disparities in military power, national history also opposed the war. The historical pattern of Russia’s massive war is the beginning of a stumbling block, a steady advance of shattering to victory. From Borodino in 1812 to Stalingrad in 1943, Chechnya in 2000, and Georgia in 2008, whenever Russia was fully committed to war, it won. Nevertheless, completely ignoring military facts and history, the Washington neocons decided to develop their say in Ukraine.
The early Aptors were reversed in the first few years of the Ukrainian War, with the Russians adapting quickly, deploying more troops, reviewing Equactics, and introducing new weapons. The ambitious Ukrainian attack in 2023, taking the lead in Western weapons, completely failing. Starting with the collapse of Avdiivka in February 2024, Russia steadily gained positions, and Ukraine has missed it. The only Ukrainian attack in recent Notes, a push to Kursk in August 2024, was defined and remodeled after a few months of battles that caused Ukraine a huge loss of material and talent.
Western resources once abundantly flowing into Ukraine are now declining, with Ukraine reaching out to weapons and munits. Although Ukraine is increasingly dependent on drones to slow Russian progress, drones cannot completely replace artillery, aircraft or armored vehicles. All of these have been declining in supply. Meanwhile, Russia’s large, growing military industrial bases provide a stable flow of weapons to Ukrainian troops. Russia’s strategy of extending Ukraine’s inadequate talent on a long front, coupled with devastating attacks at weak points, is steadily breaking down the line of defence. Apart from direct intervention by NATO forces, Ukraine can delay defat while suffering catastrophic losses.
Although the subject is that negotiations will end the war in the near future, Ukraine’s outlook is bleak. The term peace could not leave pre-Ukraine Ukraine intact, but at least hand over the Crimea, Donetsk and Lucansk regions to Russia. The continuation of the war will have even more unpleasant consequences, perhaps making Ukraine a dysfunctional ramp, losing its most productive land, facing costs and uncertain reconstruction.
The traditional war has had a major development
The Ukrainian War is a testing ground for military technology, and the outcome will lead to conflicts due to future armed conflicts. Tanks and aircraft, previously considered domain weapons in traditional warfares, are effectively challenged by accurate guided missiles and drones. This suggests that asymmetric wars will become more difficult for countries that rely on the large arms advantage of older weapons. Rebels and small nations are relatively equipped with relative, accurate care weapons to counter the military capabilities of the great nations.
Drones quickly became prominent players on the Ukrainian battlefield, offering chapters of reconnaissance and strike at much lower costs than aircraft systems, resulting in lower risk for pilots. The basic drone operates remotely and is led by a radio link. These links are clogged, but jamming equipment that needs to operate at the right frequency, the right place and the right time can always stop the drone. Modern drones communicate over long fiber optic cables, so their signals are not affected by interference. As demonstrated in recent attacks on Russian Airbasas, drones can be fired from almost anywhere, making them a versatile weapon in ally Rock. With the number of Ukrainian artillery and armored vehicles declining, drones have scholarships, and the main weapons that slow the advancement of the Russian army are largely large attacks and dangerous to witnesses of many attack drones. The Ukrainians also use naval drones that sunk some Russian ships into the Black Sea and caused the Russian navy shift from Crimea.
A surprising jamproof with a fiber optic guide drone
Polar missiles were first adopted in large-scale wars. Russians you used three different polar missiles in the Ukrainian War. Their big speed scholars, these missiles are difficult to intercept, even in the patriot system, and have an incredibly destructive power-powered academic ability to destroy deeply buried targets, such as command bunkers and equipment storage sites. Reported reports as new design non-exposed kinetic energy warhead Orshnik missiles have destroyed a wide range of underground factory facilities. NATO You don’t have a traditional missile with equal capabilities.
The glide bomb is a relatively simple but highly effective weapon that has contributed greatly to the increase in Russia’s success on the Ukrainian battlefield. By attaching folding wings and guidance systems to regular air bombs, Russia has enabled it to convert the vast inventory of the Cold War into accurate ammunition. When fired from high altitudes, the glide bomb range of 50-90 km allows carrier aircraft to remain outside the Ukrainian air defense range. The bomb makes it extremely difficult for Ukraine to take defensive poses. Because the larger glide bombs can destroy the most frightening fortress. The US expects comparable guide bombs to Ukraine, but there are too few Ukrainian attack aircraft offering large quantities. Russia drops around 100 gliding bombs every day in its Ukraine location.
What’s coming next
US foreign policymakers will not learn to avoid another fiasco like Ukraine. On the contrary, the ability to move away from Ukrainian ruins without political influence will strengthen their belief that they have a repeatable formula for maintaining obese army, selling weapons, and starting a monastery war. This pattern of our foreign policy failures has stretched from Vietnam to the present, with marks of the death and destruction of correspondents.
I expect this repetition of this circular pattern that directs a power of attorney with China in the Pacific or US war. Replace the Taiwan Independence Red Line in Ukraine in NATO Red Line, and you have a new Casasbury scenario to sell to the public. Whenever it is doubtful to increase the US defense budget, it can arrange conflicts in the South China Sea and dispatch more troops to Taiwan, bringing China closer to the brink of war. The harmful cycle of military overreach can last until the United States is financially or critically defined and exhausted. Meanwhile, thanks to internet media, the whole world is a march of foolishness.
