David J. Beer, Cato of Liberty, April 15, 2025.
excerpt:
I just had an ominous conversation with a green cardholder – for the legal forever in the US. I asked if he was wise for him as Summon, who criticized President Trump and Israel, and whether he should revere past criticism from his social media before he travels.
In a free society, the answer was: But until the Supreme Court reaffirms that the First Amendment protects non-citizens of the United States from the expulsion of their speeches, and President Trump follows the Supreme Court – we do not live in a free country.
The Trump administration has revoked green cards and visas based solely on speech. Individuals are explicitly targeted, even based on writing OP-Es that criticize foreign policy of foreign governments. This can lead to a visa revocation. The administration is also searching for electronic devices at the port of entry for evidence of “adverse” views.
DRH Note: This can be seen intrusive posts, but I don’t think the title is justified. David Beer tries to justify the title by asserting that freedom of speech includes the right to hear speech, but I think it’s stretch.
He is in a stronger ground in this paragraph:
It’s no surprise that President Trump’s administration is threatening the free speech rights of U.S. citizens in many ways, including threatening people to inform Nancity of their constitutional rights, shakedown lawsuits against media media companies, arresting people attacking lawsuits against Apoplar clients, attacking law firms that cancel state contracts that threaten state media that criticize media, and shakedown lawsuits against media media companies. Authorizes federal contractors to use the term “diversity, equity, or inclusion.”
Academy and the Government
Stephen Lansberg, Big Questions, April 16, 2025.
excerpt:
For decades, university administrators have been automating these social and political agendas by Sammo using resources from co-opening universities. This has impacted everything from employment to providing courses, to establishing and structuring athletic teams. Over time, much of this agenda has been encoded into federal missions.
If they believe that some of this agenda is contradictory or attitudes, the manager has asserted that the majority will be avoided depending on the merits of the building and will return to federal obligations as an excuse. “Hey, we don’t have a choice. If we did something different, we set up a federal government.” This unjustly ignored the option of resisting invasive politics, for example, through reasonable arguments.
Now, all of a sudden, the federal order no longer worked out what was not that good with the administrator’s personal agenda. Colleges like Harvard have also discovered the backbone.
I have mixed feelings about all of this. It’s good that universities (and everything) fight back against the government that tells them how to run equally. It’s bad to work effectively with the government when you selectively fight back and help university resources work together for joint resources when your government agenda and government agenda begin to deviate from yourself. Harvard should have returned for decades in August. Now they’re suddenly fighting back. As a function of who happens to be in the White House, will they return to shape in a few years? If so, is a sporadic backbone better or worse than having no backbone at all? I’m not a salem.
Marina Nitze, Reason, April 16, 2025.
excerpt:
According to the PRA, when agencies create or update “information gathering” (typically forms), they have expanded to user logins and profiles, customer satisfaction surveys and user rescissions, but they are first aware of the Central Office of Information and Regulatory Issues (OIRA).
Approval involves completing the form for the form (all require a thread-raal tier with approval from the internal agency) and submitting the package to the agent’s “desk officer.” The job of a desk officer is to transfer the package to me. This is certainly a role that Bob in the office space questions. However, desk officers sign the work and prioritize their own efficiency by submitting 11 huge packages a year. Recent submissions from the Forest Service included 151 forms.
Eleven Ore presides the package, which (eventually) publishes it to the federal register, a government newspaper – a staple on all breakfast tables. This proposal should be available for public comment for 60 days. The origin agency will edit responsibility for comments received, but in reality there is no need to do anything. OIR reviews this package and any proposals (whether or not they have been changed) will be replaced by the Federal Register for an additional 30 days. It may be approved after the period of addiction in OIRA reviews. This can take years in the worst case scenario.
Timothy Taylor, Conversation Economist, April 17, 2025.
excerpt:
Of course, the welfare of the country’s population is far beyond economic statistics. In one classic example of 2006, Kevin Murphy and Robert tried to eliminate profits to the US population over time in economics from a greater life experience and disease reduction. Of course, this task requires choosing the value of the additional value of lifetime is valuable in Dortel. However, the values are very large. They wrote:
It estimates the economic benefits of lower US mortality rates over the 20th century, and values future benefits from further advances in major diseases. These are values. The century of improvement in life experience was worth more than $1.2 million per person to the current population. Between 1970 and 2000, Expercy’s increase added to national wealth of about $3.2 trillion per year, with progress in heart disease alone increasing half of its initial profits. We estimate that even modest advancements against major illnesses are of great value in the future. For example, a permanent 1% reduction in cancer mortality rates has nearly $500 billion in Americans’ present value and future generations, so Werea a Cure (if one is feasible) is worth around $50 trillion.
Russia shows the opposite. It suggests that health statistics are poor and that the overall welfare of the Russian population is considerably worse than what purely economic statistics suggest. Nicholas Eberstadt provides the background to “Russian Paradox: Very Many Education, Very Little Human Capital” (American Corporations, April 8, 2025).
Amanda Morris, Scitechdily, April 17, 2025.
excerpt:
An engineer at Northwestern University revealed a very small, very small pacemaker that can be used to humiliate the body by using a syringe.
Although compatible with hearts of various sizes, pacemakers are particularly suitable for the delicate minds of newborns with congenital heart defects.
Smaller than rice grains, the device works in parallel with a lightweight, flexible wireless wearable that adheres to the patient’s chest. When the wearable senses an irregular heartbeat, it is automatically issued to the pulse of light to activate the pacemaker. These short light pulses pass through the skin, sternum and muscle tissue and regulate the heart rhythm.
